If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How fast could a propeller driven piston powered plane theoretically go ?
This video delves into the Lycoming IO-360-L2A as found on the Cessna 172S. You will learn the major components that make up this system, and how each relate...
Last edited by Jukka; 04-06-2019, 01:01 PM.
Reason: BS removed
Into the early 1950s, both the Air Force and the NACA had maintained a continuing interest in high-performance turboprop aircraft. NACA wa...
The speed limits of the old prop planes in a dive was the wing and airframe design. Theoretically props are flying many times the speed of sound, because the compressor blades in a turbojet are very much like a propeller. The key I think is to shroud the propeller. I would love to be a part of accomplishing it.
Proof of concept. Prop will work at mach tip speed, and fly at mach speed. Look up the Thunderscreech.
And it flew faster than what most sites post.
Yes someone could make a proof of concept. It is basically a thrust to weight ratio question. 4500 hps and 2000 lbs should be adequate. Little bit wing sweep and good Meredith effect and everything in balance and you are good to go.
Small two seater Brewster would be a show stopper !
With tuned wing foil and large spinner maybe not so obvious, but still a F2A.
Except the F2A is a drag monster. It would need a new wing, spinner, a way to hide the main wheels better, smaller, smoother canopy. Oh, and if you have an R2800 hanging off the front, move the cockpit back a lot to make up for the 1186lb difference between an R1820 and an R2800. There really isn't enough airplane to get the CoG correct. Add the weight of a very large prop, and there is no way the plane won't sit on its nose.
Re: How fast could a propeller driven piston powered plane theoretically go ?
Except the F2A is a drag monster. It would need a new wing, spinner, a way to hide the main wheels better, smaller, smoother canopy. Oh, and if you have an R2800 hanging off the front, move the cockpit back a lot to make up for the 1186lb difference between an R1820 and an R2800. There really isn't enough airplane to get the CoG correct. Add the weight of a very large prop, and there is no way the plane won't sit on its nose.
Will
Yes...F2A as such would be a drag monster.
I see the prop fan blades as an aswer...in a sleek twin.
Estimated top speed for that is M 0.8...620 mph ~ 988 kmh.
Dart racer with pusher prop and transsonic architecture was estimated to go M 0.82 (1014 kmh).
Into the early 1950s, both the Air Force and the NACA had maintained a continuing interest in high-performance turboprop aircraft. NACA wa...
The speed limits of the old prop planes in a dive was the wing and airframe design. Theoretically props are flying many times the speed of sound, because the compressor blades in a turbojet are very much like a propeller. The key I think is to shroud the propeller. I would love to be a part of accomplishing it.
The Piaggio P-180 Avanti is currently the fastest propeller driven aircraft ( no jet )......at 927 km/h 576 mph.
Comment