If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Mr. Creighton King (mr. Cassutt) told me the flying tail is not allowed in F1 racers...for a certain reason.
I wonder still how much more speed could be gained with a working t-tail with all flying elevator.
Anyone want to estimate it ?
Should it be investigated and implemented ?
Flaps are ok he told me.
Flap are legal, but completely unnecessary. They just add weight, drag, and complexity. Plus they don't work all that well. A full flying tail isn't needed either. Nothing to gain from it, and lots of down side. Thus the "reason".
Flap are legal, but completely unnecessary. They just add weight, drag, and complexity. Plus they don't work all that well. A full flying tail isn't needed either. Nothing to gain from it, and lots of down side. Thus the "reason".
I see...in jets they ( stabilators ) can be much smaller than in GA planes.
I see no reason why a highly swept wing could't get benefit from all flying tail.
Can you enlighten why not ?
Oh sorry...you mean flaps...yes...they are legal....but all flying tail is apparently not ?
Comment