Good-day folks,
One of the questions that often turns in my head, is the age-old question of the suitability of the P-39 for pylon racing.
The quick facts that stand out to me are; the great success of 'Cobra II' during the Cleveland era. And Mr. Carroll's ambition to develop a pylon racer out of that derelict P-39, rather then his expensive, and fast Signal Sea Fury.
The Sea Fury... what was wrong with it as a pylon racer to begin with? We know now, after history, not a whole lot. The wing is right, and the airplane does well on the course. Race #87 was the pioneer of racing Sea Furies, and also, of course, was only powered by the sleeve valve Centaurus. However, with that said. It's an airplane that from the factory is almost 90mph faster than the P-39.
So why... Why does Carroll... Why does Slovak.. why choose the P-39??
Personally I'm a believer. I think had projects like 'Cobra III', and 'Mr Mennen' been devised in today's modern world of air racing, with the things that have been learned up til this point, the aircraft could have been developed to be very capable of competitive speeds. (even by today's standards)
The aircraft is going to way significantly less than a Mustang. And have less frontal area, if I assume correctly.
PIREPS say that a properly configured P-39 handles extremely well. The room in the nose for an ADI tank, and other goodies would seem to be a positive feature. Also, the potential of aft CG would seem a plus, in regards to drag and overall co-efficiency.
So.. Let's talk this out, again, for a bit.. I want to hear the best reasons from the critics, of why the P-39 wouldn't do well. And also the opinions of believers like myself, who are optimistic about it's capabilities.
Roll on... and Happy Holidays!
- Joseph
One of the questions that often turns in my head, is the age-old question of the suitability of the P-39 for pylon racing.
The quick facts that stand out to me are; the great success of 'Cobra II' during the Cleveland era. And Mr. Carroll's ambition to develop a pylon racer out of that derelict P-39, rather then his expensive, and fast Signal Sea Fury.
The Sea Fury... what was wrong with it as a pylon racer to begin with? We know now, after history, not a whole lot. The wing is right, and the airplane does well on the course. Race #87 was the pioneer of racing Sea Furies, and also, of course, was only powered by the sleeve valve Centaurus. However, with that said. It's an airplane that from the factory is almost 90mph faster than the P-39.
So why... Why does Carroll... Why does Slovak.. why choose the P-39??
Personally I'm a believer. I think had projects like 'Cobra III', and 'Mr Mennen' been devised in today's modern world of air racing, with the things that have been learned up til this point, the aircraft could have been developed to be very capable of competitive speeds. (even by today's standards)
The aircraft is going to way significantly less than a Mustang. And have less frontal area, if I assume correctly.
PIREPS say that a properly configured P-39 handles extremely well. The room in the nose for an ADI tank, and other goodies would seem to be a positive feature. Also, the potential of aft CG would seem a plus, in regards to drag and overall co-efficiency.
So.. Let's talk this out, again, for a bit.. I want to hear the best reasons from the critics, of why the P-39 wouldn't do well. And also the opinions of believers like myself, who are optimistic about it's capabilities.
Roll on... and Happy Holidays!
- Joseph
Comment