Re: Understanding the Super Stangs
Full Disclosure:
I'm the FNG here in so many ways. I know virtually nothing about aerodynamics, race motors (Mouse, rat, or otherwise), CG, etc. Moreover, my only frame of personal reference is from 2003 forward. Not exactly a wealth of historical data points.
That said, one can make a solid argument that the "Super 'Stangs" as most have defined below stand on the shoulders of many, many other race aircraft...and by definition, many, many other very smart, crafty, and forward-leaning folks.
I think Big Jim is spot on. If....IF....we are in the waning days of UNL "Super 'Stang" racing, there are really only three ships to consider.
What do they have in common and what separates them from each other? How much does the classificiation of "Super 'Stang" depend on who's pulling the levers? How much secret sauce was shared between them, and how much was kept locked away in a jar, in a safe, in a vault, under a volcano?
One of the better threads on AAFO in a while. Well done!
Full Disclosure:
I'm the FNG here in so many ways. I know virtually nothing about aerodynamics, race motors (Mouse, rat, or otherwise), CG, etc. Moreover, my only frame of personal reference is from 2003 forward. Not exactly a wealth of historical data points.
That said, one can make a solid argument that the "Super 'Stangs" as most have defined below stand on the shoulders of many, many other race aircraft...and by definition, many, many other very smart, crafty, and forward-leaning folks.
I think Big Jim is spot on. If....IF....we are in the waning days of UNL "Super 'Stang" racing, there are really only three ships to consider.
What do they have in common and what separates them from each other? How much does the classificiation of "Super 'Stang" depend on who's pulling the levers? How much secret sauce was shared between them, and how much was kept locked away in a jar, in a safe, in a vault, under a volcano?
One of the better threads on AAFO in a while. Well done!
Comment