If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"...FAA designates credentialed photographers as "non-essential personnel" thereby relegating them to shoot only from outside an air show's aerobatic box. This will prevent any EAA or credentialed media photographers forward of the crowd line during the daily Oshkosh air shows."
Imagine if that were to go through and apply even at Reno (or any Air Race event)... the Victors, Griffon Girls and Wayners of the world would be in a tight spot. Let's hope the EAA is able to talk some sense into the FAA.
I think there is a difference here, though. In an 'aerobatic box', the aircraft is coming, going, approaching, etc. from different angles and areas at any given time...because the box is stationary. If a photographer is 'inside' that box, there is no 'safe' area.
At Reno, when the designated press is out at the pylons, we are 'inside' of what the FAA considers the 'scatter area'. Momentum would carry any wreckage away from us, not at or towards us.
I don't think those same laws of physics apply to an aerobatic box.
For example, a proposed rule mandates that flight directions during air shows "shall be in one direction only." Literal interpretation would affect just about every large warbird air show in the country, including Oshkosh.
What??? How does one do an Immelman or cuban 8 in "one direction only"?
So when was the last time a spectator was injured here in the good 'ol U S of A at an airshow??? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler?
All valid questions Victor. What about the opposing solos? Hmmmmmm? How they goin ta do dat?
Air Race Addict, and firm believer in the idea that you can't have opposing solos if they are going the same direction.
Comment