Re: Aluminum Overcast
Does that make it right? It seems to me that it was the jury's duty to determine fault, not find a way to get the medical bills paid.
I know that sounds cold, but deep pockets litigation hurts everybody in the long=term. What if someone had been injured when the O2 bottles blew on Merlins Magic and a jury decided that the Airport Authority was at fault for allowing an unsafe condition to exist? Do you think they'd assume that kind of liability the next year, or would they just refuse to allow the event to be held on their property?
But the most important question remains - did either of the pilots have a low-altitude waiver in order to conduct that formation takeoff?
Does that make it right? It seems to me that it was the jury's duty to determine fault, not find a way to get the medical bills paid.
I know that sounds cold, but deep pockets litigation hurts everybody in the long=term. What if someone had been injured when the O2 bottles blew on Merlins Magic and a jury decided that the Airport Authority was at fault for allowing an unsafe condition to exist? Do you think they'd assume that kind of liability the next year, or would they just refuse to allow the event to be held on their property?
But the most important question remains - did either of the pilots have a low-altitude waiver in order to conduct that formation takeoff?
Comment