Re: I have a surprise!!
Oh man Alisobob, you just opened a can of worms! IMO, standardization in a cutting edge environment kills innovation. I went to the Indy 500 15 years straight -- until IRL came around and mandated motors and chassis choices.
Secretive development and incremental leaps in perfromance are what it's all about in my book.
Teams don't share innovation because they want their ideas to prove superioir in use. They want to drink the champagne, to be the big kahunas, to stand ALONE in the winner's circle. Once their innovations are known, then it's up to the competitors to equal and surpass the best guy's work -- if they can.
Comapre the work that's gone into Reno unlimited racers over the last 20 years and the quantum leap in qualification and race speeds. If you didn't have private, proprietary innovation, there wouldn't be a Tiger vs. Lyle, or a Dago vs. the world at Dago's peak.
On a grander scale, sharing vs singular, proprietary innovation can be compared analogously to capitalist vs. socialist societies. Who won the cold war? Where would you rather live?
Give me the freedom to create, innovate and win in the private sector, anyday! If I have to share my work right away, I have a huge dis-incentive thrown on my efforts. (Ah heck, let's go drink vodka, instead!)
Next...
Oh man Alisobob, you just opened a can of worms! IMO, standardization in a cutting edge environment kills innovation. I went to the Indy 500 15 years straight -- until IRL came around and mandated motors and chassis choices.
Secretive development and incremental leaps in perfromance are what it's all about in my book.
Teams don't share innovation because they want their ideas to prove superioir in use. They want to drink the champagne, to be the big kahunas, to stand ALONE in the winner's circle. Once their innovations are known, then it's up to the competitors to equal and surpass the best guy's work -- if they can.
Comapre the work that's gone into Reno unlimited racers over the last 20 years and the quantum leap in qualification and race speeds. If you didn't have private, proprietary innovation, there wouldn't be a Tiger vs. Lyle, or a Dago vs. the world at Dago's peak.
On a grander scale, sharing vs singular, proprietary innovation can be compared analogously to capitalist vs. socialist societies. Who won the cold war? Where would you rather live?
Give me the freedom to create, innovate and win in the private sector, anyday! If I have to share my work right away, I have a huge dis-incentive thrown on my efforts. (Ah heck, let's go drink vodka, instead!)
Next...
Comment