Re: BD-10 accidents..a mystery ?
According to WIKI:
I don't know of any other existing airframes, but the BEDECORP folks haven't given up on it:
LINK:
I hope they solve the airframe problems first...
.
Originally posted by retroaviation
According to WIKI:
N2BD: original prototype, owned by Fuel Fresh in Nevada, tail number reassigned to a Dassault Falcon 900, unflyable
N9WZ: Peregrine's kit, crashed
N62PJ: Peregrine's kit, crashed
N700JP: Jim Priebe's kit, sold to Monitor Jet, now privately owned in Canada, unflyable
N7FF: Frank Everett's kit, crashed
N9WZ: Peregrine's kit, crashed
N62PJ: Peregrine's kit, crashed
N700JP: Jim Priebe's kit, sold to Monitor Jet, now privately owned in Canada, unflyable
N7FF: Frank Everett's kit, crashed
I don't know of any other existing airframes, but the BEDECORP folks haven't given up on it:
LINK:
BD-10
This kit is no longer in production but did prove to be an outstanding aircraft. The original BD-10 incorporated a GE J-85 engine. The civilian version of the CJ610, that was used in the early Lear Jets, proved to be very reliable.
The real problem was, however, that these engines are of older technology and the fuel consumption was just too high. We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines.
This kit is no longer in production but did prove to be an outstanding aircraft. The original BD-10 incorporated a GE J-85 engine. The civilian version of the CJ610, that was used in the early Lear Jets, proved to be very reliable.
The real problem was, however, that these engines are of older technology and the fuel consumption was just too high. We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines.
I hope they solve the airframe problems first...
.
Comment