If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes and no. Yes, "Air Biscuit" was the best the Navy had in 1941, and "Sneak Attack" (and an earlier version of White Lightnin') were the best the Army Air Forces had. But for all they lacked in some of the advancements of the Zero and BF-109, they were still superior in other ways. Longer range (P-38) than the BF-109, and better armor and self-sealing fuel tanks (all USAAF and USN) than the Japanese airplanes.
All the technological advancements in the world will be little or no help when your enemy can out turn and out climb you.
Where the Zero was lacking in armor and sealing fuel tanks it more then made up for in its ability to out dogfight its opponent. Standard procedure when encountering a Zero in anything less then the perfect situational advantage was to not engage and leave the area as fast as possible.
All the technological advancements in the world will be little or no help when your enemy can out turn and out climb you.
Where the Zero was lacking in armor and sealing fuel tanks it more then made up for in its ability to out dogfight its opponent. Standard procedure when encountering a Zero in anything less then the perfect situational advantage was to not engage and leave the area as fast as possible.
That's why you don't fight an enemy with those advantages by their rules. Getting into a typical turning dogfight with a Zero was suicide.
We got by the climbing/turning disadvantage by making high speed attacks using our greater velocities. The Zeros couldn't get a decent shot if you could strike and then outrun them.
Our earliest aircraft were limited in this ability, but top speeds of allied aircraft grew quickly, while the zeros remained light, slow and maneuverable, and as mentioned, far more vunerable due to lack of tank sealing and armor for the pilot.
Stock Bearcats were wicked machines when they came out, and for some time after. Too bad we didn't have them earlier in the war.
Looking up specs, top speed is rated at 421 mph, so Howard's bird is right up there where it should be.
I read somewhere in a magazine about a public air display shortly after the war, when they had a race between a new jet fighter and a stock Navy Bearcat. From a standstill on the runway, they took off and the Bearcat could beat the jet to 10,000 feet!! In another tale, a P-38 and a Bearcat took off at the same time and the 'cat could take off into a loop and do an overhead gunnery pass at the P-38 as it was retracting it's gear!! True or not, I'd say Grumman got it right with the Bearcat.
The Jet/Bearcat takeoff was at the Cleveland air races & I got to see that. It was between the F9F Panther versus the F8F Bearcat. There may have been others.
OK, Back on topic! Thanks Howard for all of the years that you supported the Air Races, both with your magnificent flying, and with your magnificent aircraft! After 30+ years of seeing you bend the pylons, you are going to be sorely missed! Here's wishing you all the best in your future indeavors......... Below is a shot of Howard and Tiger shooting the breeze on arrival Saturday.........
On Sat the 19 i was looking for tee shirts and went to Howard pit and they didnt have any in my size well they had John Teglers Gentiman you have a race got it for 15 dolars and it wa sign by Howard and the last chapter is when he came to race the BearCat shawn
Comment