Re: R-4360 test cell run
Agreed, on a purely mechanical basis. Sleeve valves, dual crankshafts, etc.- it would be hard to think of a piston engine more complicated than a Sabre. The 4360 is actually fairly simple by comparison. As others have pointed out, a space shuttle engine takes metallurgy (and plumbing!) to a higher level of complexity, but is simpler from a moving parts perspective. Its hard to really compare the complexity that all the lines of software it takes to run a modern Detroit v8 and automatic transmission add to the system, but its not trivial. I would argue that most any modern car engine is more complex in terms of counting how many events occur per second to keep it running (ie, how many times are the MAF, throttle, O2 (upstream and downstream), cam position, crank position, and knock sensors interrogated... then how many calculations occur to come up with a fuel injection and spark event cycle...)
Originally posted by jarrodeu
View Post
Comment