Re: So...What about STREGA???
Agree. (hence the wink and big grin smileys in my post FuryFan),
That said, what got me thinking about it when I read your own tongue in cheek joke post though; is that when I was going thru the (recip) power-plant semester at A&P school towards the end of the 3 yrs I just finished, I was going back and forth between the "ASA" textbooks our program was officially using, and "Jeppeson" textbooks to clarify things for myself.
And although I can't remember which said which at the moment, one of the two did actually refer to the "fork & blade" arrangement (as implemented in the Merlins, Allisons, etc.) as a "master and articulated rod pairing".
Its all just semantics anyway, but I can understand their rationale though, because the blade rod does indeed articulate on the O.D. bearing surface of the common big end bearing, which is clamped immobile in both sides of the forked rod bearing caps, (according to that textbook at least).
At the time, I remember thinking to myself that they were really trying to feed me that hogwash just to keep terminology standardized with the (much more common) radials, where rods that are'nt articulated, are master rods period.
Picture me with smoke coming out of my ears for 3 yrs straight, just trying to figure out which meaningless definitions the FAA test questions would arbitrarily agree with!
Cheers, Chuck
Agree. (hence the wink and big grin smileys in my post FuryFan),
That said, what got me thinking about it when I read your own tongue in cheek joke post though; is that when I was going thru the (recip) power-plant semester at A&P school towards the end of the 3 yrs I just finished, I was going back and forth between the "ASA" textbooks our program was officially using, and "Jeppeson" textbooks to clarify things for myself.
And although I can't remember which said which at the moment, one of the two did actually refer to the "fork & blade" arrangement (as implemented in the Merlins, Allisons, etc.) as a "master and articulated rod pairing".
Its all just semantics anyway, but I can understand their rationale though, because the blade rod does indeed articulate on the O.D. bearing surface of the common big end bearing, which is clamped immobile in both sides of the forked rod bearing caps, (according to that textbook at least).
At the time, I remember thinking to myself that they were really trying to feed me that hogwash just to keep terminology standardized with the (much more common) radials, where rods that are'nt articulated, are master rods period.
Picture me with smoke coming out of my ears for 3 yrs straight, just trying to figure out which meaningless definitions the FAA test questions would arbitrarily agree with!
Cheers, Chuck
Comment