A few years ago I was so inspired by the photography here that I went out and got a Canon 350D and a sigma 70-200 2.8 and a 28-70 2.8. The camera takes great pictures and the Lenses are great for what I do. All recommended to me by a friend who works with Getty Images.
First, I would like to add a wide angle lens.. 17-XX and get as close to 2.8 as I can afford. I was using my dad's 18mm and was not impressed with it in the sense that it was not all that wide. SInce the 350D has a 1.6 multiplying on the lens so that lens is really 28.8 and so not really WIDE. (is that correct?)
So, do I get a lens that is more like 10-20mm to be able to get that wide look? I think 14mm is fisheye?
Secondly, I would like to get another camera since my 350D has about 60K shots on it. I was going to get the new 40D as a step up but with the lens multiplier, would it be better to get an older DSLR that will have a full range ?
Thanks
Jeff
First, I would like to add a wide angle lens.. 17-XX and get as close to 2.8 as I can afford. I was using my dad's 18mm and was not impressed with it in the sense that it was not all that wide. SInce the 350D has a 1.6 multiplying on the lens so that lens is really 28.8 and so not really WIDE. (is that correct?)
So, do I get a lens that is more like 10-20mm to be able to get that wide look? I think 14mm is fisheye?
Secondly, I would like to get another camera since my 350D has about 60K shots on it. I was going to get the new 40D as a step up but with the lens multiplier, would it be better to get an older DSLR that will have a full range ?
Thanks
Jeff
Comment